How many matric failed in 2013

Minister of Basic Education Angie Motshekga made history in two ways on Monday when she announced the 78.2% pass rate of the 2013 matrics.

Firstly, this is the highest pass rate in the history of post-1994 education in South Africa after 2012’s 73.9%. Secondly, the announcement was made against a backdrop of scepticism even before the results were released.

In total, 654 723 matrics wrote the national senior certificate exams in 2013 compared to 592 704 pupils in 2012.

Of this figure, 562 112 were full-time candidates, which is an increase from 511 152 in 2012.

There were 92 611 part-time candidates – an increase from 81 552 in 2012.

Out of the full time candidates, 439 779 passed, while 30.6% of these received university exemption.

The number of maths passes in 2013 increased to 142 666 from 121 970 in 2012.

Physical science passes are up to 124 206 in 2013 from 109 918 in 2012.

In a surprise development, neither Gauteng nor the Western Cape occupied either of the top two positions that they’ve enjoyed for several years.

Instead, the top province was the Free State whose 87.4% this year propelled it to the number one spot, compared with its third position last year. The North West, which last year was in fourth position, jumped to number two with 87.2%.

This was followed by Gauteng with 87% and the Western Cape with 85.1%.

Mpumalanga achieved a pass rate of 77.6%, KwaZulu-Natal of 77.4%, while the bottom three provinces were the Northern Cape with 74.5%, Limpopo at 71.8% and the Eastern Cape with 64.9%.

See also How do matric points work

‘Discouraging and disheartening’
Speaking before Motshekga, Deputy Minister Enver Surty obliquely referred to criticism widely published over the weekend and on Monday that the matric results are an unreliable indicator of the quality of the whole school system. He said it was “discouraging and disheartening when people”, some “in academia”, set about “denigrating” the “progress we have made away from mediocrity”.

Motshekga briefly alluded to pre-release doubts about how reliably the pass rate measures the schooling system. She listed various high-performing districts, some in rural areas, and concluded that these figures gave a picture that is “contrary to what some would have us believe – [namely] that our results hide inequalities”.

She said that “all indicators of quality are also part of the upward trend”. Motshekga referred to the increase from 20.1% of pupils in 2008 who were granted permission to apply to study towards a bachelor degree to 30.6% in 2013.

She said that 78 407 pupils from the three poorest categories of schools “… quintile one, two and three … obtained admission to bachelor studies”.

“Therefore it is evident that schools coming from poor communities are demonstrating good performance … The notion that the schools from the more elite communities are propping up the pass rate is therefore invalid.”

Year	Pass rate
1995	53.4%
1996	54.4%
1997	47.4%
1998	49.3%
1999	48.9%
2000	57.9%
2001	61.7%
2002	68.9%
2003	73.3%
2004	70.7%
2005	68.3%
2006	66.5%
2007	65.2%
2008	62.5%
2009	60.6%
2010	67.8%
2011	70.2%
2012	73.9%
2013	78.2%
2014	75.8%